Your question
Under which assumptions can your growth be funded?
I examine how customer acquisition, staffing and payments fit together in your growth plan. You see which assumptions support the plan, how different outcomes affect it and which options that gives you for your next step.
The introductory call is free and without obligation. No financial documents are needed beforehand.
Under which assumptions can your growth be funded?
Customer starts, revenue, capacity, hiring and cash receipts.
A reasoned scenario comparison and the funding each option needs.
A B2B software business sells an existing subscription product. Its management plans more customers and four additional employees for 2027. The existing forecast is to be reviewed before the hires are approved.
Six customer starts per month, one customer lost each month and all four hires from January.
120 active customers × €2,000 produce €240,000 recurring revenue in December. Whether sales and implementation support that path is still to be established.
I work back from the goal to its requirements: how many suitable enquiries are needed, when contracts become active customers, what capacity is available then and when the payment arrives.
That creates an explained basis for deciding on hiring, priorities and funding.
| Assumption | Example value |
|---|---|
| Monthly fee per active customer | €2,000 |
| Existing fixed operating payments | €110,000 / month |
| Marketing budget | €18,000 / month |
| Variable service costs | 20% of monthly revenue |
| Existing onboarding capacity | 4 customer starts per month |
| Agreed reserve | €120,000 |
| January systems/equipment investment | €30,000 |
| Unpaid December invoices at start of year | €120,000 |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally.
The €110,000 includes the existing team, including sales. Marketing and new roles are additional. All amounts are net. Cash balances are calculated before VAT and income-tax payments.
A sales conversion rate becomes useful when its customer group and time period are clear. I review definitions, sample sizes and timing. The review evidence below belongs to this invented example.
60% attend a meeting · 20% of those sign
50% attend a meeting · 20% of those sign
Four customer starts are already confirmed for both January and February. The review retains this opening pipeline. New enquiries become potential starts after two months of lead time.
| Assumption | Existing plan | Example review evidence | Calculation consequence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualified enquiries | 50 / month | About 40 so far; new budget is intended to enable 50 | 50 still needs evidence; downside: 40. |
| Product meetings from enquiries | 60% | Comparable completed sales cohorts: 50% | Reviewed assumption: 50%. |
| Contracts from product meetings | 20% | Completed sales cohorts support 20% | Retained; downside: 15%. |
| Time to customer start | No lead time | One month selling, one month preparing | New January enquiries generate revenue no earlier than March. |
| Opening pipeline | Not shown separately | Four confirmed starts each in January and February | Confirmed starts are retained. |
| New implementation employee | Productive immediately | One month of ramp-up | Additional capacity from the following month. |
| Customer losses | One each month | Renewal plan for the original 60 customers | Retained; downside: two. |
| Payment | Same as revenue | Invoice paid in the following month | Plan revenue and collections separately. |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally.
Real sales cohorts need enough time to observe completed outcomes. Open opportunities are not yet won or lost deals. The review also examines whether rates transfer to new customer groups.
106 customers in December. In this case, the new implementation employee starts in January and can onboard eight customers per month from February. The original target of 120 needs additional conditions.
After the eight confirmed starts, 64 are needed from March to December: an average of 6.4 per month. At 50% meeting conversion and 20% contract conversion, this requires an average of 64 qualified enquiries each month.
I translate the growth target into the sales performance, lead time and capacity it requires. More marketing spend does not automatically produce proportionally more qualified enquiries. That relationship needs evidence.
The reviewed assumptions allow two hiring schedules: all four roles from January or a staged expansion. Their total monthly costs stay the same. Start dates and productive capacity change.
Additional product modules
€78,000 in the model year
Onboarding new customers
€45,500 in the year · more capacity from July
Ongoing support
€27,500 in the year · fully ramped from September
€149,000 less paid for new roles. That is only part of the decision: later capacity also delays customer starts and revenue. The figures are assumed total employer costs.
Until June, capacity permits four starts per month. Five customers are ready from March, so the backlog grows to four waiting customers.
From July, onboarding capacity rises to eight starts per month. Eight customers start in July and six in August, clearing the backlog. Waiting customers generate no subscription revenue until they start.
I show financial options alongside their operational conditions. Staged hiring is one possible solution under these assumptions. Its suitability also depends on product strategy, customer commitments and available capacity.
This calculation shows the staged hiring case in the fictional example. It separates active customers, revenue and cash collection, bringing every item through to the month-end balance.
66 customers carried from February, four actual starts and one loss. One of the five customers ready to start waits for onboarding.
Activation and loss occur at the start of the month in this example, so the full monthly fee applies.
Collections come from February invoices. March revenue of €138,000 is paid in April.
Modelled cash balance · before VAT and income-tax payments.
Subscription businesses also call recurring monthly revenue MRR. In the staged case, December MRR is €212,000. Multiplying by twelve gives an annualised December figure of €2,544,000. Full-year 2027 revenue is €1,996,000 because the customer base grows during the year.
Opening cash less the operating loss, additional unpaid customer invoices and the January investment. Receivables grow from €120,000 to €212,000. Revenue that has not yet been collected ties up cash.
Each case starts from the same opening position. It changes specific sales assumptions, hiring dates or the timing of hypothetical funding. That makes the reason for each difference clear.
The funding comparison is available when the downside case is selected.
Selected: Reviewed assumptions · staged hiring
Modelled cash balance · before VAT and income-tax payments
Blue line: Reviewed assumptions · staged hiring
Grey lines show the other baseline cases. The funding line appears when selected. Month-end balances do not show intramonth payment peaks. On small screens, scroll the chart horizontally.
| Month | Starts | Waiting | Active customers | Revenue | Collections | Payments | Equity | Closing cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 4 | 0 | 63 | €126,000 | €120,000 | €183,200 | €0 | €386,800 |
| February | 4 | 0 | 66 | €132,000 | €126,000 | €154,400 | €0 | €358,400 |
| March | 4 | 1 | 69 | €138,000 | €132,000 | €155,600 | €0 | €334,800 |
| April | 4 | 2 | 72 | €144,000 | €138,000 | €156,800 | €0 | €316,000 |
| May | 4 | 3 | 75 | €150,000 | €144,000 | €158,000 | €0 | €302,000 |
| June | 4 | 4 | 78 | €156,000 | €150,000 | €165,700 | €0 | €286,300 |
| July | 8 | 1 | 85 | €170,000 | €156,000 | €181,500 | €0 | €260,800 |
| August | 6 | 0 | 90 | €180,000 | €170,000 | €189,000 | €0 | €241,800 |
| September | 5 | 0 | 94 | €188,000 | €180,000 | €190,600 | €0 | €231,200 |
| October | 5 | 0 | 98 | €196,000 | €188,000 | €192,200 | €0 | €227,000 |
| November | 5 | 0 | 102 | €204,000 | €196,000 | €193,800 | €0 | €229,200 |
| December | 5 | 0 | 106 | €212,000 | €204,000 | €195,400 | €0 | €237,800 |
Collections come from prior-month invoices; January comes from unpaid December invoices. Payments include variable costs, existing fixed expenses, marketing, new roles and January investment. All amounts net. Scroll horizontally to see every column.
| Result | Management plan | Reviewed assumptions · immediate hiring | Reviewed assumptions · staged hiring | Downside case · same hiring schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active customers in December | 120 | 106 | 106 | 74 |
| December monthly revenue (MRR) | €240,000 | €212,000 | €212,000 | €148,000 |
| Full-year 2027 revenue | €2,220,000 | €2,018,000 | €1,996,000 | €1,642,000 |
| Additional personnel costs in 2027 | €300,000 | €300,000 | €151,000 | €151,000 |
| Operating result before D&A, interest, tax | -€60,000 | -€221,600 | -€90,200 | -€373,400 |
| Lowest modelled cash during year | €172,000 | €95,600 | €227,000 | €18,600 |
| Month of lowest balance | August | October | October | December |
| Largest shortfall against reserve | €0 | €24,400 | €0 | €101,400 |
| Modelled December cash | €240,000 | €106,400 | €237,800 | €18,600 |
This table always shows the four baseline cases without funding. The funding selection updates the selected case’s metrics and monthly calculation. Scroll horizontally to see all columns.
Lower additional staffing costs less the contribution lost through delayed starts. Annual revenue is €22,000 lower; at 20% variable costs, €17,600 contribution is lost. December cash is therefore €131,400 higher than with immediate hiring under the reviewed assumptions.
€120,000 is an invented threshold for this example. It is intended to retain room after planned payments. In the real project, we justify the reserve using upcoming obligations and potential deviations.
Positive cash alone does not establish that the next expansion is funded. All four cases have a negative 2027 operating result before depreciation, interest and tax.
In the downside case, we separately calculate a purely hypothetical €150,000 equity injection. It is not committed. This table shows why its timing matters to the decision.
| Month-end cash | Funding in October | Funding in December |
|---|---|---|
| October | €243,400 | €93,400 |
| November | €205,200 | €55,200 |
| December | €168,600 | €168,600 |
| Lowest balance during year | €133,200 | €55,200 |
On small screens, scroll this table horizontally.
Both cases end at €168,600. If funding arrives in December, November is up to €64,800 short of the reserve. Interim funding would need to be available in time. It is neither approved nor automatically free, and is not included in these figures.
Equity increases cash, not revenue or operating earnings. Fees, conditions, and interest and repayments for other funding forms are added in the actual project.
My work concludes with an assessment of the results and their conditions. A prioritised summary for this example could look like this:
106 rather than 120 customers under reviewed assumptions
Adjust the target or substantiate the required enquiries, contracts and implementation capacity.
Timing changes cash payments and customer starts
Assess staged hiring against customer commitments and the module roadmap.
The downside case falls below the reserve from October
Review hiring approvals again and arrange funding before it is needed.
We agree on what evidence an approval needs: supported sales data, expected customer starts, appropriate capacity, payments actually received and enough cash after the next obligations. You can then continue the planning as new information arrives.
A detailed modelling project can provide an editable system or file. You change the agreed inputs and see how customers, costs and payments respond. These three previews come from this example’s calculated workbook.
The file opens with “Reviewed / staged”. On “Inputs”, choose a case from 0 to 3. In the downside case, set the equity month to 0, 10 or 12. The model calculates one active case at a time. The website comparison uses the unchanged assumptions explained here; edits in the workbook do not change the website.
MRR definition: Stripe: monthly recurring revenue. All example figures are our own fictional calculations, not Stripe data.
You do not need a complete model for our first conversation. In the free, no-obligation call, we clarify the decision you want to make and which information is already available.
We discuss your question, existing plan and the appropriate review scope.
A defined review with a written assessment and prioritised next steps.
If needed, we model customers, staffing, scenarios and payments in more detail under a separate scope.
For ongoing needs, I support updates and decisions under an agreed monthly retainer.
A focused review of an existing growth plan.
€1,500 netWe agree the specific review scope before you commission the work.
Arrange a free introductory callThe detailed integrated example on this page shows a possible scope for further work. It is not fully included in the €1,500 Growth Check.
A new model, detailed customer and staffing schedules, extensive scenarios or ongoing reporting require a separate agreement. The Finance Decision System may suit a bespoke model build. You then also receive an agreed editable system or file with a personal explanation.
Project scope and fee depend on the decision, available information and modelling required.
Ongoing support as a Strategic Finance Partner€1,500 net, plus statutory VAT where applicable. The Growth Check provides a written decision assessment. An additional editable model forms part of a separately agreed project.

I am interested in how a good idea becomes a financially sustainable business model. I connect your experience of the business with the figures available and the assumptions for your next step.
I have worked in finance and controlling for more than ten years. I now use the skills I developed in an international corporate group for SMEs and start-ups. You work directly with me and can follow how the assessment is reached.
More about me and how I workThe Growth Check reviews an existing forecast or financial model. If no usable plan exists yet, we discuss a suitable build in the introductory call.
The Growth Check reviews the existing plan. A full rebuild or extensive expansion is agreed as a separate project. The Finance Decision System may be suitable for a bespoke model build.
No. The fee covers a defined Growth Check with a written assessment, initial scenario considerations, prioritised recommendations and a closing discussion. The detailed integrated example also illustrates further modelling, which requires a separate scope.
A written decision assessment covering critical assumptions, missing evidence, initial scenario logic and prioritised next steps. An additional modelling project also provides an editable system or file with an explanation.
No. SaaS, or subscription software, is one fictional application here. The review also fits other business models and internal growth and staffing decisions. Revenue drivers and payment flows are adapted to your business.
It describes only the modelled balance at the end of December 2027. Funding needs beyond that horizon, tax due dates and intramonth payments require additional planning. Simply projecting today’s cash using an unchanged monthly loss would be insufficient here.
In the free, no-obligation introductory call, we discuss your question and existing plan. I then suggest an appropriate scope. No financial documents are needed beforehand. We exchange confidential information through a secure route agreed together.
Book a free introductory call →Opens external appointment booking with Calendly.